Mr. Ibrahim Lamorde, Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission |
President Muhammadu Buhari on Monday fired the
Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Mr. Ibrahim Lamorde,
thus bringing his reign as the country’s anti-graft tsar to an end amid fraud
allegations.
The President called the EFCC boss into Aso Rock
Presidential Villa and told him that his time was up, The PUNCH
learnt.
Lamorde’s sacking came few weeks to the end of his four-year tenure. He would
have completed his four-year term later this month.
The Special Adviser to the President on Media and
Publicity, Mr. Femi Adesina, in a two-paragraph statement, said Lamorde would
be proceeding on terminal leave ahead of the expiration of his four-year tenure
in February 2016.
President Muhammadu Buhari |
The statement read, “President Muhammadu Buhari
has approved the appointment of Mr. Ibrahim Mustafa Magu as the Acting Chairman
of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission .
“Mr. Magu, who is an Assistant Commissioner of
Police, is to take over from Mr. Ibrahim Lamorde who is proceeding on terminal
leave ahead of the formal expiration of his tenure in February next year.”
The sacked EFCC boss had met behind closed-doors
with the President shortly after the latter inaugurated the new National
Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission, Prof. Mahmood
Yakubu, and five INEC national commissioners.
It was during the meeting that Buhari reportedly
told Lamorde to vacate office as the anti-graft commission’s chair.
Lamorde did not speak with reporters at the end
of the encounter.
Lamorde recently hit the headlines when a
security expert, George Uboh, accused the EFCC boss of allegedly diverting
N1trn in cash and properties said to have been recovered from convicted
looters.
In the main, Uboh accused Lamorde of diverting
proceeds accruable from the sale of properties recovered from a now-late former
governor of Bayelsa State, Diepreye Alamieyesiegha; and former
Inspector-General of Police, Tafa Balogun, among many others.
The Ministry of Justice recently directed the
EFCC to probe Lamorde over the allegations but the House of Representatives
countered the order and instead said the police and the Independent Corrupt
Practices and other related Offences Commission should handle the
investigation.
The House’s directive followed public
consternation and condemnations by lawyers of the inappropriateness of an
agency accused along with Lamorde to handle the probe.
The ex-EFCC boss is also under probe by the
Senate.
The upper chamber’s Committee on Ethics,
Privileges and Public Petitions however on Monday announced the indefinite
postponement of Lamorde’s probe. The probe had been scheduled to proceed on
Tuesday (today).
The Clerk to the committee, Mr.
Freedom Osolo, in a press release in Abuja, failed to give reasons for the
postponement.
The statement read in part, “I regret to inform
you that the hearing of the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public
Petitions, slated for Tuesday, 10th November, 2015, has been postponed for the
time being.
“You will be duly informed when the meeting is
rescheduled, please. The committee regrets any inconveniences the postponement
would have caused you.”
Osolo had on Thursday, November 4, issued a
statement that the committee would hold a public hearing with all petitioners
and those they petitioned on Tuesday (November 10), by 2:00pm at the Meeting
Room, 120, New Senate Building, National Assembly, Abuja.
The Chairman of the committee, Senator Samuel
Anyanwu, who had earlier confirmed to The PUNCH on Friday that Lamorde
would appear before the panel on Tuesday, failed to give reasons for the
postponement, when contacted on the telephone.
“I am in Lagos for an oversight function and I
need to know the true position,” Anyanwu said to one of our correspondents.
Lamorde |
Former President Goodluck Jonathan had on
November 23, 2011, named Lamorde as the EFCC acting chairman after sacking his
predecessor, Mrs. Farida Waziri.
His appointment was later confirmed by the Senate
on February 15, 2012.
The PUNCH had reported exclusively in
October that Buhari had ruled out the possibility of giving Lamorde a second
term in office.
Meanwhile, mixed reactions greeted Lamorde’s
sacking on Monday. Some lawyers said that investigation into allegations
against Lamorde must continue despite his removal from office while
others said the ex-EFCC boss was a victim of corrupt powerful Nigerians.
A Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Dr. Joseph Nwobike,
said though Lamorde did his best while in office, another anti-graft agency
such as the ICPC should investigate the allegations against him.
Nwobike said, “I think he has tried his best. But
be that as it may, another agent of government charged with criminal investigation
such as the ICPC should go ahead to investigate the allegations against him and
prosecute him if he is found to be culpable like any other Nigerian. But there
must be regard to his rights as provided for in the constitution.”
A former chairman of the Ikeja branch of the
Nigerian Bar Association, Mr. Onyekachi Ubani, also called for investigations
into many “unproved” allegations against the former EFCC boss.
Ubani said, “The speculation about his removal
has been in the air for some time. There are a lot of unproved allegations
against him. There is also an allegation that he did not fight corruption under
the previous administration of President Goodluck Jonathan and that he suddenly
woke up under the present administration of President Muhammadu Buhari.
“But let it be that the Presidency has complied
with all the legal requirements before relieving him of his appointment which
is tenured.”
Another SAN, Emeka Ngige, said Lamorde could not
achieve much in the fight against corruption because he was appointed by a
“corrupt” administration.
He added that there must be an investigation into
the allegation against him “despite that it was levelled by an ex-convict.”
The Executive Director, the Socio-Economic Rights
and Accountability Project, Adetokunbo Mumuni, said, “What I think should
happen further is that investigation into the stories making the rounds must be
pursued and the outcome be made public. If indeed Lamorde has committed any
offence, subsequently he should be made to face prosecution to see whether he
will be able to defend himself before the appropriate court of law. And if he
is found guilty, he should face the consequences.
“If the system has tolerated him up till this
point, why wouldn’t they give him the couple of days before the expiration of
his tenure?”
The Chairman, the Coalition Against Corrupt
Leaders, Mr. Debo Adeniran, said, “One thing that such sacking would engender
is the fear of good people serving at anti-corruption or regulatory agencies as
chairman or head. It has been established that when you fight corruption,
corruption fights back and these corrupt elements are ruthless if they have to
fight back.’’
The Chairman, Civil Society Network Against
Corruption, Mr. Lanre Suraj, also expressed dissatisfaction over the sacking of
Lamorde just days before the expiration of his tenure as the EFCC chairman,
more so when he had not been found guilty of any wrongdoing in spite of the
allegations against him.
Suraj said rather than humiliate him with a sack,
he could have been asked to proceed on a terminal leave, while another leader
would be shopped for the agency.
In Suraj’s view, the anti-corruption war in
Nigeria can neither be effective nor be sustained where the leaders of the
anti-corruption agencies are subjected to summary dismissal.
A Lagos-based lawyer, Mr. Wahab Shittu, said, “I
have no comment on the sack of Ibrahim Lamorde except to say that the
government has its prerogative to decide who it would make the EFCC chairman. I
think it is in line to thank Mr. Lamorde for the service rendered to the
country and also wish for the best in terms of who will take his place.”
0 comments:
Post a Comment